Proposal:Relation:postal code
- Note that there is another boundary relation system with
boundary=postal_codewhich is already in wide use.
- Note that there is another boundary relation system with
| Relation:postal_code | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Obsoleted (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | Robx |
| Tagging: | type=postal_code
|
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2008-07-02 |
This Relation could replace postal_code=* on ways. There should be one relation per postal code, grouping all streets with this postal code.
Tags
| Key | Value | Discussion |
|---|---|---|
| type | postal_code | defines the type of the relation |
| postal_code | * | the postal code |
Members
| Way or Node | Role | Recurrence? | Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
| (blank) | zero or more | street with this postal code |
Notes
- One might want to add other objects associated with the postal code to the relation, e.g., buildings. On the other hand, if they're already associated with a street in the relation, this isn't necessary.
- If a street consists of several ways, you can add a Relation:street to the postal code relation instead of the separate ways.