Negative conclusion from affirmative premises
![]() |
This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.
Negative conclusion from affirmative premises could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed. |
Cogito ergo sum Logic and rhetoric |
![]() |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
v - t - e
|
Not to be confused with negative proof or affirmative conclusion from a negative premise.
A negative conclusion from affirmative premises (also illicit affirmative) occurs when a categorical syllogism has a negative conclusion, but two affirmative premises.
It is a syllogistical fallacy and a formal fallacy.
Forms
You commit this fallacy if you use either of the following false syllogisms:
- P1: Some A are B.
- P2: Some B are C.
- C: Some A are not C
- P1: Some A are B.
- P2: Some B are C.
- C: No A are C.
See also
External links
- See the Wikipedia article on Negative conclusion from affirmative premises.
- NEGATIVE CONCLUSION FROM AFFIRMATIVE PREMISES, Logically Fallacious
- Negative Conclusion from Affirmative Premisses, Fallacy Files
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.