Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/ekši-
Proto-Turkic
Etymology
Generally considered simplex, however EDAL, based on Proto-Mongolic *hekexün (“sour”) and Manchu ᡶᡝᡴᠴᡠᡥᡠᠨ (fekcuhun, “astringent”) under the disputed Altaic theory, suggests a derivation from *ek-, however there does not exist a suffix *-ĺči-.
There is no note of Oghuz dialect in اَكْشِكْ (ekşig) in Kashgarî's dictionary.
Verb
*ekši-
Descendants
- Oghuz:
- Karluk: (If not borrowed from Oghuz)
- ⇒ Karakhanid: اَكْشِكْ (ekşig)[1]
- Chagatai: [script needed] (ekşi-)
- ⇒ Karakhanid: اَكْشِكْ (ekşig)[1]
References
- ^ al-Kashgarî, Mahmud (1072–1074) Besim Atalay, transl., Divanü Lûgat-it-Türk Tercümesi [Translation of the “Compendium of the languages of the Turks”] (Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları; 521) (in Turkish), 1985 edition, volume I, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurmu Basımevi, published 1939–1943, page 105
- Clauson, Gerard (1972) “”, in An Etymological Dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon Press, →ISBN, →OCLC, page 119
- Nişanyan, Sevan (2002–) “ekşi”, in Nişanyan Sözlük
- Räsänen, Martti (1969) Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen (in German), Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura, page 39
- Starostin, Sergei, Dybo, Anna, Mudrak, Oleg (2003) “*ek-ĺči-”, in Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages (Handbuch der Orientalistik; VIII.8), Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill