Key:crossing:markings

Description

The existence and style of pedestrian crossing markings.

Group: crossings

Used on these elements

Requires

crossing=*

Useful combination

crossing=*

Status: approved

More details at taginfo

Tools for this tag

taginfo · AD · AT · BR · BY · CH · CN · CZ · DE · DK · FI · FR · GB · GR · HU · IN · IR · IT · LI · LU · JP · KP · KR · NL · PL · PT · RU · ES · AR · MX · CO · BO · CL · EC · PY · PE · UY · VE · TW · UA · US · VN
overpass-turbo
OSM Tag History

For the purposes of =*, 'markings' shall be those markings on the ground meant to draw attention to the area where slower traffic (e.g. pedestrians, horses, cyclists) is to cross the road. The standard for these markings can vary from country to country, but are usually required to be the same colour as the other road markings, in high visibility white or yellow. This is most commonly done with paint or bright bricks.

Values

This tag is most commonly used in conjunction with crossing nodes (mainly highway=crossing but also e.g. railway=crossing when the crossing area is marked) and crossing ways (e.g. highway=footway + footway=crossing, highway=cycleway + cycleway=crossing and highway=path + path=crossing).

For the purposes of documentation and discussion, markings parallel to the crossed road should be referred to as 'bars' while markings orthogonal to the roadway should be referred to as 'lines'.

Key	Value	Description	Example
	`no`	The absence of crossing markings at a crossing. Implied by `crossing=unmarked`. May be useful in combination with `crossing=traffic_signals` where there is no marking on the ground, but there is a pedestrian signal.
	`surface`	A crossing which is not differentiated by high visibility road markings, but only by a change in surface. Depending on the jurisdiction, this may or may not be considered a proper crossing. Additional details can be added with the established tags `surface=` and `surface:colour=`. `=solid` has been discussed to document crossing markings which are all high-vis paint for the width of the crossing, but it has been determined that this is too rare (and confusing to mappers) to merit a top level entry in the schema.	.
	`lines`	Lines on either side of the crossing (U.S.: "standard/transverse"; Canada: "twin parallel lines")
	`lines:paired`	Pairs of lines on either side of the crossing.
	`dashes`	Dashed lines on either side of the crossing. Used in some countries (such as Germany) at (nearly) all signalized crossings.
	`dots`	Dotted lines on either side of the crossing. The dots sometimes are reflectors slightly raised from the carriageway. (U.S.: "dashed"). In former CIS countries used as cycleway crossing markings.
	`rainbow`	This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. A crossing with rainbow colours, other than in zebra pattern or lines along the crossing.
	`lines:rainbow`	This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. Rainbow coloured lines along the crossing.
Zebra style crossings
	`zebra`	Regularly spaced bars along the length of the crossing. (Called "continental" in the United States.)
	`zebra:double`	The similar to zebra, but split in the middle. (U.S.: "triple-four")
	`zebra:paired`	Like a zebra crossing but skipping every third bar to avoid premature tire wear. (U.S.: "double-paired")
	`zebra:bicolour`	A zebra crossing with alternating colours. The colours can be tagged using `crossing:markings:colour=*`.
	`zebra:rainbow`	This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. A zebra crossing with rainbow colours.
Ladder style markings
	`ladder`	Lines perpendicular to the roadway along with bars parallel to the roadway.
	`ladder:skewed`	Two lines orthogonal to the direction of the roadway with diagonal bars connecting the two lines. Sometimes confusingly referred to as "zebra" in the United States.
	`ladder:paired`	Ladder-style markings with the bars paired together.
Pictogram crossing markings
	`pictograms`	Painted pictogram(s) of pedestrian and/or bicycle (with or without arrows)
Unspecified or unknown crossing markings
	`yes`	An unspecified or unknown crossing marking. Can also be used in document any crossing marking which hasn't been documented.

More values may be documented as they are discovered or invented by governments.

More difficult cases

In the case of segregated crossings for pedestrians and cyclists, this can be tagged separately as cycleway:crossing:markings=* and footway:crossing:markings=*.

The color of the markings can be specified using the standard colour=* scheme (e.g. crossing:markings:colour=yellow).

Multiple values of =* can be separated by a semicolon to specify multiple patterns atop each other (see examples below).

Crossing with marking which change in the middle of the crossing

Although quite rare, if a crossing has markings which change within a single crossing, one can tag this most precisely by splitting the crossing way and tagging the individual segments with the appropriate value of =*. The highway=crossing node should still be tagged with the most prominent value for =* or simply =yes.

Examples

Example	Tagging
	The most accurate way to tag this would be `highway=crossing` `crossing=uncontrolled` `=zebra;dots` `crossing_ref=zebra` However, simply tagging the markings as `=zebra` shouldn't be considered "wrong", simply a less detailed description. Note: Dots refers to the very small markings right besides the zebra bars. The more prominent dashed give-way-lines are a separate feature.
	A segregated foot and cycle crossing `highway=crossing` `crossing=traffic_signals` `bicycle=yes` `segregated=yes` `footway:crossing:markings=zebra` `cycleway:crossing:markings=dots` `crossing:signals=yes`
	A shared pedestrian and cyclist crossing `highway=crossing` `crossing=uncontrolled` `bicycle=yes` `segregated=no` `=zebra;dots`
	`highway=crossing` `crossing=uncontrolled` `=zebra` `crossing:markings:colour=gold`
	`highway=crossing` `crossing=uncontrolled` `=lines` `surface=paving_stones`
	`highway=crossing` `crossing=uncontrolled` `=dashes;pictograms` `surface:colour=red` `=surface` does not apply, since both, the road and the crossing, are `surface=asphalt`.
	Artistic crosswalk `highway=crossing` `crossing=uncontrolled` This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information. See the talk page for more information. `=lines:rainbow` This crosswalk is painted in various colors, but it isn't a solid marking; the white lines are still required for it to be a legal crosswalk (in the US).

Where crossing:markings is not appropriate

Buffer markings

These markings act as a painted curb extension for pedestians, somewhat common in Germany.

crossing:buffer_marking=* was proposed to document this. See Verkehrswende-Meetup/Gehwege for more details (in German).

Look left/look right markings

These markings should not be included in =* as they serve a different role from a crossing markings.

No scheme has been proposed to document these (yet).

Software support

Editors and other contributing tools

iD includes a preset with icons.
JOSM's standard map style marks crossings with different icons depending on this key. [1]
The JOSM Sidewalks plugin synchronizes =* between the way and node representations of a given crossing.
osm-yolo-crossings sets =zebra on crossings that it detects. [2]
StreetComplete asks whether there are markings of any kind. [3]

Renderers

Straßenraumkarte Neukölln depicts values such as zebra and surface. [4]

Routers

GraphHopper considers =yes to be synonymous with crossing=traffic_signals and =no crossing:signals=no to be synonymous with crossing=unmarked. [5]

Possible tagging mistakes