-도다
See also: 도다
Korean
Alternative forms
- -로다 (-roda) — used only in certain environments, for which refer to usage notes.
Etymology
From Middle Korean -도〮다〮 (Yale: -twótá) first attested in hangul form in Seokbosangjeol, 1447.
Pronunciation
- (SK Standard/Seoul) IPA(key): [to̞da̠]
- Phonetic hangul: [도다]
| Romanizations | |
|---|---|
| Revised Romanization? | doda |
| Revised Romanization (translit.)? | doda |
| McCune–Reischauer? | toda |
| Yale Romanization? | tota |
Suffix
-도다 • (-doda)
- (dated or humorous) A formal non-polite exclamatory ending used to express admiration or surprise.
- Synonym: -는구나 (-neun'guna)
- 양사언(楊士彦) (Yang Sa'eon), 태산가(泰山歌), Middle Korean translation in modernized language
- 시편 135:11 (KRV 개역한글) [Psalm 135:11 (Korean Revised Version)][1]; English translation from the King James Version[2]
- (humorous, mainly 1st person) A formal non-polite exclamatory ending used to declare a certain fact.
Usage notes
- Even though this was a requirement in Middle Korean, Modern Korean 도다 (-doda) does not have to be substituted with -로다 (-roda) after -이다 (-ida), 아니다 (anida), or -으시- (-eusi-). When used after them, -로다 (-roda) tends to sound more old-fashioned.
- -로다 (-roda) is still obligatory after -으리 (-euri).
Middle Korean
Alternative forms
- -로〮다〮 (-lwótá) — after the copula and -으〮리〮- (-úlí-)
- -옷〮다〮 (-wóstá) — after -ᄂᆞ- (-no-), -더〮- (-té-), and -거- (-ke-)
Etymology
A compound suffix made up of -도〮- (-twó-, emotive suffix) and -다〮 (-tá, declarative mood suffix).
Suffix
도〮다〮 (twótá)
- An exclamatory sentence-final suffix
Related terms
- -도〮소〮ᅌᅵ다〮 (-twóswóngìtá, the polite version)
See also
| Middle Korean sentence enders | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form | Mood | Notes | Applied to 셔 (sye-, “to stand”) | ||||
| -다〮 (-tá) -라〮 (-lá) |
Declarative | Unmarked | 셔다〮 (Yale: syètá) | ||||
| -우〮마〮 (-wúmá) | Promissive | 셔우〮마〮 (Yale: syèwúmá) | |||||
| -ㄴ (-n) | -다〮 (-tá) | Interrogative | Realis | Obligatory for second-person (2P) subject | 션다〮 (Yale: syèntá) | ||
| -가〮 (-ka) | Polar question, non-2P subject | 션가〮 (Yale: syènká) | |||||
| -고〮 (-kwo) | Wh-word question, non-2P subject | 션고〮 (Yale: syènkwó) | |||||
| -ㅭ (-lq) | -다〮 (-tá) | Irrealis | Obligatory for 2P subject | 셜따〮 (Yale: syèlttá) | |||
| -가〮 (-ká) | Polar question, non-2P subject | 셜까〮 (Yale: syèlkká) | |||||
| -고〮 (-kwó) | Wh-word question, non-2P subject | 셜꼬〮 (Yale: syèlkkwó) | |||||
| -니〮- (-ní-) | -아〮 (-Gá) | Realis | Non-honorific | Polar question | 셔니〮아〮 (Yale: syèníGá), 셔녀〮 (Yale: syènyé) | ||
| -오〮 (-Gwó) | Non-polar question | 셔니〮오〮 (Yale: syèníGwó), 셔뇨〮 (Yale: syènywó) | |||||
| -ㅅ- (-s-) | -가〮 (-ká) | Deferential | No polarity distinction | 셔닛〮가〮 (Yale: syèníská) | |||
| -ᅌᅵᆺ- (-ngìs-) | Highly deferential | 셔니〮ᅌᅵᆺ가〮 (Yale: syèníngìská) | |||||
| -리〮- (-lí-) | -아〮 (-Gá) | Irrealis | Non-honorific | Polar question | 셔리〮아〮 (Yale: syèlíGá), 셔려〮 (Yale: syèlyé) | ||
| -오〮 (-Gwó) | Non-polar question | 셔리〮오〮 (Yale: syèlíGwó), 셔료〮 (Yale: syèlywó) | |||||
| -ㅅ- (-s-) | 가〮 (-ká) | Deferential | No polarity distinction | 셔릿〮가〮 (Yale: syèlíská) | |||
| -ᅌᅵᆺ- (-ngìs-) | Highly deferential | 셔리〮ᅌᅵᆺ가〮 (Yale: syèlíngìská) | |||||
| -라〮 (-lá) | Imperative | Ordering | Non-honorific | 셔라〮 (Yale: syèlá) | |||
| -아〮쎠〮 (-ássyé) -어〮쎠〮 (-éssyé) |
Deferential | 셔〮쎠〮 (Yale: syéssyé) | |||||
| -쇼〮셔〮 (-syósyé) | Highly deferential | 셔쇼〮셔〮 (Yale: syèsyósyé) | |||||
| -고〮- (-kwó-) -오〮- (-Gwó-) |
-라〮 (-lá) | Requesting | Non-honorific | 셔고〮라〮 (Yale: syèkwólá) | |||
| -려〮 (-lyé) | Deferential | 셔고〮려〮 (Yale: syèkwólyé) | |||||
| -ᅌᅵ- (-ngì-) | -다〮 (-tá) | Highly deferential | 셔고〮ᅌᅵ다〮 (Yale: syèkwóngìtá) | ||||
| -져〮 (-cyé) | Propositive | Plain | 셔져〮 (Yale: syècyé) | ||||
| -사〮- (-sá-) | -ᅌᅵ- (-ngì-) | -다〮 (-tá) | Deferential | 셔사〮ᅌᅵ다〮 (Yale: syèsángìtá) | |||
| -ㄴ (-n) | -뎌〮 (-tyé) | Exclamatory | Self-honoring | 션뎌〮 (Yale: syèntyé) | |||
| -ㅭ (-lq) | -셔〮 (-syé) | 셜쎠〮 (Yale: syèlssyé) | |||||
| -고〮나〮 (-kwóná) | Only sixteenth century | 셔고〮나〮 (Yale: syèkwóná) | |||||
| Based on 나찬연 2020, 중세 국어의 이해; Lee and Ramsey 2011, History of the Korean Language. Morphological segmentation of the verbal paradigm sometimes differs between analyses. The list is not exhaustive. | |||||||